Hiring on the mountain


As anyone with bad knees will tell you (🙋🏻‍♀️),

Downhill is not always easier.

The same applies to resumes.

When hiring, we often look for impressive titles, big brands, and upward career progressions.

We associate these with competence and with success.

But here's the thing:

That's not what those titles signify.

Those titles only tell us what other folks have thought about a candidate in the past.

Those titles show the opportunities this candidate has been given by others.

Those titles tell you that this candidate got to the top of a mountain,

But they don't tell you HOW they got there - or what they learned along the way.

If you’re hiring for a startup, this is especially important.

Because transitioning from a startup to a big business is infinitely easier than going the other way.

Why?

Because startups force you to understand the entire business.

Many of the top CFOs I interview say that working in startups was a critical step in their education.

Meanwhile, big business experience often teaches all the wrong instincts for a startup—

How to specialize, silo, politic, and optimize for stability instead of growth.

So when you’re evaluating a candidate, it doesn’t matter so much if they:

  • Worked for a great brand
  • Went to the best school
  • Managed a huge P&L

I’d rather hire someone who was the last one standing at a shuttering startup,

Than someone who happened to be along for the ride at a Fortune 100.

It’s not about whether they climbed up the mountain or stumbled down it.

What matters is that they struggled and survived,

And have lived to tell you the tale in this interview.

Your Daily CFO,

Lauren

Founder-Friendly Finance

CEO-turned-CFO & finance instructor, Lauren Pearl, drops a daily tip that helps startup founders grow their businesses and control their destinies. Learn why this growing list with a 60% open rate led to LP being named top 25 Finance Thought Leader and host of the #3 CFO podcast for 2025

Read more from Founder-Friendly Finance

Often, when I'm called in to help a new client, they aren't 100% sure what's broken. Sure, they may have theories, But often, the only thing they know for sure are the symptoms of a problem. The problem itself is still a little unclear. "We don't have enough revenue to hit our next milestone with investors." Isn't specific enough to be actionable; Are you not charging enough per seat? Are you not discoverable in the market? Are you targeting the wrong customers? Are you losing customers after...

As a startup leader, it can be incredibly challenging to balance time spent being strategic vs. executing. In particular, when you’re entering a new market or pivoting or evolving your product. Spend too much time on execution, and you’ll get no where fast. Spend too much time on strategy, and you’ll get no where slowly. How do you know you’ve reached the perfect balance? Be strategic for long enough to know which questions you should be asking your market. Then execute until you’ve answered...

Recently, I was chatting with a fellow CFO about the things required to build financial projections for a company. This person shared a belief that's highly common among finance folks: To do any kind of financial forecasting, you first need to build a solid financial operations foundation. The thinking goes... If you don't have excellent data on what's historically happened within the company, Then how could you EVER hope to possible predict what will happy in the future? What could you...