|
AI is supposedly making us faster. In conversations with founders and engineers, I’m hearing the same story: Prototypes that once took weeks now take days. Code that required whole teams now gets drafted in an afternoon. Experiments are cheaper, iteration is faster, and the barrier to entry for creating new products has never been lower. But speed in one part of the system often exposes constraints elsewhere. Recently, I’ve been reading Abundance, Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson’s new book on why America struggles to build, even as our tools get better. Construction is the classic example: We know how to build faster - Prefabrication, automation, 3D design - the technology is there. Yet construction productivity in the U.S. has fallen by over 30% since 1970, while overall productivity has more than doubled. The reason isn’t technical capability; It’s people and process. Layers of regulation, legal risk, permitting delays, and public opposition have slowed projects to a crawl. The median federal environmental review still takes more than two years. It's started me thinking: We all expect AI to be the panacea that speeds up our building and makes anything possible, But companies aren't machines: They're ecosystems. And they're vulnerable to the same pitfalls seen in Klein & Thompson’s example. AI may solve technical bottlenecks, only to expose a more challenging limitation: Us. The real questions become:
This is also why I’m less concerned when individuals worry about “falling behind” in the AI race than many headlines suggest. In a landscape where the tools change daily, The distance between an early adopter and a latecomer is actually smaller than it’s ever been. It feels like everyone thinks they're racing in a marathon When actually - for most folks - with every evolution of the tech, you're actually waking up to a new opportunity to begin at the starting line every day. Anyone can catch up. What will separate winners from laggards isn’t how fast they adopt AI - It’s how well they address the next bottleneck once the technology problem is solved. The teams that figure out decision velocity, governance design, and internal alignment will create more value than those focused only on technical capability. In other words: AI will make it cheaper to build. But people will determine how fast we go And how much actually gets done. Your Daily CFO, Lauren |
CEO-turned-CFO & finance instructor, Lauren Pearl, drops a daily tip that helps startup founders grow their businesses and control their destinies. Learn why this growing list with a 60% open rate led to LP being named top 25 Finance Thought Leader and host of the #3 CFO podcast for 2025
Recently, I read a comment from a startup advisor peer about the lack of women in VC-funded startup leadership. Essentially: "Maybe this is just a product of preference. Maybe women are just more risk-averse. And maybe men are simply dumb enough to try." While framed as flattery, it disguises something ugly- It’s a tidy explanation for the funding gap That promotes a dangerous narrative Which is also - blatantly - wrong. Women do start venture-backed companies - many of them. About 1 in 5...
The junior employee who says: “Managers are a complete waste of money - they just sit around doing nothing while others work.” The first-time founder who says: “Big-firm lawyers are a total rip-off. I’m paying $700/hour for a contract that should just be a free template.” The nursing student who says: “Ugh, doctors don’t know ANYTHING.” The independent consultant who says: “Those jerks at McKinsey are a scam. People pay them millions and all they do is create a PowerPoint and walk away.”...
One of the biggest differences when transitioning from doer to manager is how best practices on communication change. When you’re a doer executing for a boss, the best bet is to lead with solutions. Every executer worth their salt eventually realizes that just pointing out problems doesn’t really help the team. That just creates work for someone else (Potentially the exact person deciding whether you stick around to get a raise). So it’s better to carry the ball all the way down the court:...